Sunday, September 9, 2018

Exercise effect in the BIGGEST LOSER TV series







"It is a question that plagues all who struggle with weight: Why do some of us manage to keep off lost pounds, while others regain them?

Now, a study of 14 participants from the “Biggest Loser” television show provides an answer: physical activity — and much more of it than public health guidelines suggest.

On average, those who managed to maintain a significant weight loss had 80 minutes a day of moderate activity, like walking, or 35 minutes a day of vigorous exercise, like running.

The researchers conducting the new study did not distinguish between purposeful exercise, like going to the gym and working out, and exercise done over the course of the day, like walking to work or taking the stairs.

Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, by comparison, call for at least 150 minutes a week of moderate exercise, or 75 minutes a week of vigorous exercise for healthy adults.

The study was published on Tuesday in the journal Obesity. The lead author, Kevin Hall, chief of the Integrative Physiology Section at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and his colleagues also presented their work at the Obesity Society’s annual meeting.

Although the study is very small and must be replicated, Dr. Hall said, it is the first to assess obese people years after they lost weight with state-of-the-art methods to measure the calories they had consumed and the amount of exercise they had done.

The researchers did their measurements when the contestants were chosen, and again at six weeks, 30 weeks and six years after the contest began.

“The findings here are important,” said Rena Wing, a psychiatry professor at Brown University and a founder of the National Weight Control Registry, which includes more than 10,000 people.


The food eaten “is the key determinant of initial weight loss. And physical activity is the key to maintenance,” she said.
The study also helps explain why that might be.

One consequence of weight loss among the “Biggest Loser” participants was a greatly slowed metabolism.

The subjects were burning an average of 500 fewer calories a day than would be expected, Dr. Hall and his colleagues found.
In essence, their bodies were fighting against weight loss.

Those who kept the weight off “are countering the drop in metabolism with physical activity,” Dr. Hall said.
During the initial weight loss, the equation was different. Then, the difference between how much weight “Biggest Loser” contestants lost could be explained by the number of calories they cut from their diets. The amount of exercise did not distinguish those who lost more from those who lost less.
The contestants competed for six months to see who could lose the most weight. Participants followed a grueling diet and an exhausting exercise program.

Contestants’ average weight at the start of the show was 329 pounds. At the end, it was 200 pounds, a 129-pound loss.

But six years after the study ended, their average weight rebounded to 290 pounds,
just 38 pounds less than when they started.

That average, though, hid wide variations.
To learn more, Dr. Hall and his colleagues divided the group of 14 into two.
There were the “regainers,” the seven participants who ended up after six years weighing five pounds more on average than they had at the start.

Erinn Egbert was a candidate for Season 8 of the “Biggest Loser” television show, but ultimately did not make the cast. She decided to lose the weight on her own and dropped about 120 pounds.
And there were the “maintainers,” the seven who maintained an average weight loss of 81 pounds.

To measure the number of calories the contestants burned, the researchers asked the subjects to drink “doubly labeled water,” in which hydrogen and oxygen atoms are at least partially replaced by stable isotopes, which have a different atomic mass.

The oxygen isotopes appear in carbon dioxide exhaled by subjects, which allowed the researchers to estimate the average amount exhaled each day. The more calories burned, the more carbon dioxide exhaled.

Some “Biggest Loser” contestants — including the first author, Dr. Jennifer Kerns, now an obesity specialist at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Washington — said the conclusions of the new study confirmed their own experiences.
Dr. Kerns, a contestant in Season 3 of the show, says she has managed to keep off 100 pounds only by tracking everything she eats and by exercising on an elliptical cross-trainer for 35 to 40 minutes a day. In addition, her job requires her to walk around the hospital seeing patients.

She has learned that she cannot relax this regimen if she wants to maintain her weight. “My natural tendency is to regain,” she said.

Erinn Egbert was a candidate for Season 8 of the “Biggest Loser” but ultimately did not make the cut. So she went home “to figure it out on my own.”
She hired two trainers and followed a diet and exercise program while she finished her senior year at Ohio State University. She weighed 237 pounds when the show began and lost about 120 pounds.
She has maintained a weight that is just eight pounds more. She does it with rigid portion control and regular, intense exercise — 45 minutes to an hour a day, Monday through Saturday, doing the Beachbody programs, a challenging combination of strength training and cardiovascular exercise.
Ms. Egbert, who is 30 and lives in Lexington, Ky., says she learned the importance of working consistently to stay thin, even with a slowed metabolism.

Danny Cahill won the “Biggest Loser” competition in Season 8. He lost 239 pounds and exercised two and a half hours a day for four years. Then injuries piled up, and he was unable to keep to an exhausting regimen.

“You have got to keep at it every single day,” she said.
It’s a difficult task for virtually anyone, Dr. Kerns said: “The amount of time and dedication it takes to manage one’s food intake and prioritize exercise every day can be an untenable burden for many people.”

“It’s totally unfair to judge those who can’t do it,” she added.

Dr. Hall agreed. “The idea that people who regain lost weight are necessarily slothful and gluttonous is an unfortunate stigmatization that is not based in fact,” he said.

Danny Cahill, who is 47 and lives in Tulsa, Okla., is among those who found it increasingly difficult to keep up the sort of regimen he needed to avoid gaining weight.
He won the “Biggest Loser” competition in Season 8. He weighed 430 pounds when the show began, and lost 239 of them.
For the four years after the show, he exercised more than two and a half hours a day and gained back just 40 pounds.
Then the injuries began, forcing him to cut back his workouts to one and a half hours a day. His weight crept up to 235 pounds.
The next year, “my body just started breaking down,” he said. “I had a foot injury, a wrist injury. I couldn’t keep it up.” And he was exhausted.
His weight went up to 300 pounds. For the last two years, his weight has remained stable at about 340 to 350 pounds, “but only because I am eating as very little as I can,” he said.
“That’s the disheartening part,” Mr. Cahill said. Losing the pounds is one thing. Keeping them off?
“I am still struggling with it,” he said."











Saturday, September 8, 2018

I probably eat 2500 to 3,000 calories a day to avoid any hunger.

My basic LCHF diet


High Fat, High Protein, Low Carb menu for one day
                   cal fat    sat fat carbs protein sodium oz/grams
3 eggs     295        24g 6g         1.5 g 18g    210 mg       150g   
3 Bacon 126 10g    3g            0g 9g 246mg         24g
3 sausages   652        51g 18g           3g 45g     2310mg      9oz/255g    
Tenderloin     500          20g 10g           0g 80g      170mg      10 oz       


Total             1,573       105g 37g         4.5g 152g    2936mg                       


% calories                 60%fat        21%sat fat       1.1%carb 38.7% protein

Atkins                         60%fat 20%SF    11% 29% protein
Ornish                            6%fat 1%SF 77%                  16% protein
Weight Watchers         24% fat 7%SF             56% 20% protein


FAT(105X9=945) divide by 1,573= 60%


carb (4.5X4=18) divide by 1,573 = 1.1%


protein (152X4=608) divide by 1,573 = 38.7%


Total cholesterol 1,060 mg


I have been on a diet similar to this since Jan. 2011.  
My LDL-P has been excellent.
Carbs do creep in during the day.
I have salad with Blue Cheese dressing.  
I have coffee with cream.
I eat olives.
I drink approx. 12 oz wine/d often.
I eat muenster cheese, swiss cheese.
I will have a bagel once or twice a week.
I use a lot of mayo in my tuna and cook my eggs with butter
and put it on my steak sometimes.
I have stayed on this diet because I have not gained weight on it and I am not hungry.


I have followed my advanced lipid profile, CAC and CIMT frequently
and the results are excellent.my lab data


Since my return from my Southeast driving tour,  
I have gone from 263 pounds back to 256 pounds.
That is the weight I started this diet on in Jan 2011.
 On the car tour I was sedentary and I had more carbs than usual.
 Mostly 3 pizzas.
Sushi rice also seems bad for me.

I really probably eat 2500 to 3,000 calories a day when I add in all the extras. 

Want to lose weight get sick

"UPDATE 9-5-18
I was on a seven day cruise out of Paris to Normandy.  Very nice. Great drink package and met good Australian drinking buddies. Good time. I keep on LCHF on cruise with occasional bite of ice cream. 
I stopped lifting weights on this trip and since the trip.  I have been disappointed with trying to get more muscle with  less fat. I ate 200 gram protein a day and got up to two sets of 25 reps.  Increased weight as it got easier so that I would feel the burn in the last few repetitions. At 66 yo I am on testosterone 100mg/d yet it is an effort and while I did look better, my weight went up as I was on low dose Actos to improve my FBS.  No real difference in FBS, around 150.
I will still lift weights and walk 20 minutes a day for health. However in accordance with my Bon Vivant diet I will not push the protein (at least 110 g/d) high fat and try not to eat any carbs.  I am not hungry on meds. 
This last week I had diverticulitis.  I took flagyl and bactrim.  Flagyl causes an antabuse reaction so I have not drank any alcohol for last 10 days. 

DATE           Weight           Glucose       Ketones
7-2017          199.2 lbs       136              0.6
8-1-18            217.8 lbs      154                       Before Paris Cruise
8-13-18          219.6 lbs      144                       After Paris cruise, plane ride
9-6-18            209.4 lbs      189              0.6   Diverticulitis, no ETOH 10d

           










Wednesday, September 5, 2018

New Answer to Dave Feldman's Lipid Challenge

For the Full story LINK

CASE STUDY of Man who developed coronary plaque with:

Fasting lipid panel:
total cholesterol: 174 (last year 178; “desirable”)<200 span="">
HDL: 60 (last year 56; 40);
LDL: 101 (last year 100; “optimal”<100 b="">, “desirable”/“near optimal”<130 span="">

total cholesterol/HDL ratio 2.9 (last year 3.2);

Triglycerides: 61 (last year 71;

Dave's Criteria for his challenge:
So here’s the criteria, pure and simple — all of which must be met for a given group in the submitted study:

  1. HDL Cholesterol of 50 mg/dL or above ( greater than 1.29 mmol/L) Check for President Bush
  2. Triglycerides of 100 mg/dL or below (greater than 1.13 mmol/L) Check for President Bush
  3. LDL Cholesterol of 130 mg/dL or above (greater than 3.36 mmol/L) His LDLc was 101 which is not optimal and high for someone with CAC of 4
  4. Either high Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) or high Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) (see the section below) Bush got a stent for his lesion
  5. By “normal” and “non-treated“, I mean:
    • No stratifying by specific genetics None
    • No stratifying by drugs (no drug studies) Was on low dose but soon taken off
    • No stratifying by a particular illness in advance of the study. (duh!) No
    • In other words, just a generally broad group of people like Framingham Offspring or the Jeppesen study
  6. And here’s some fine print that should be obvious, but just in case…
    • The study needs to be published in a reputable journal New York Times
    • It has to be dated before this article was posted, of course Yes
    • The study needs to have at least 400 participants that are stratified by this criteria. (The two studies above have over 500) Just a Black Swan
    • I’d prefer no unusual “modeling” or “adjustments” to alter the data too far from it’s original set. This one goes by the honor system — if you have such a study and it is clearly warranted, I can give it a pass.

What is Considered High Rates of CVD or CHD?


The most recent statistics I was able to find on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) comes from National Center for Health Statistics and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Their data is reflected in this article from Harvard Health Publishing, Heart Disease: A Guide to Preventing and Treating Coronary Artery Disease.

This may not meet Dave's criteria but it is certainly a BLACK SWAN
in his theory of

High HDLc & Low TG being:

PROTECTIVE FROM CVD

If you want a CAC tell Docs about your chest pain as President Bush did.

Docs are obligated to be certain chest pain is not cardiac.
If Doc says it is not, you reply you looked it up on internet and it sounds cardiac, like angina.


No stent for President Bush if he went to Topeka

Diagnosing Insulin Resistance

How to Calculate if you have insulin resistance?   @fatemporer Ivor Cummings link

More conservative calculator for IR link

When to USE  HOMA calculator?
"Patients evaluated for potentially impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes."

by

ABOUT THE CREATOR

David R. Matthews, MD, is a Professor of Diabetic Medicine at the University of Oxford. He is the Deputy co-ordinator and member of the Executive and Policy Advisory Committees of the UK Prospective Study of Diabetes (UKPDS), as well as the founder of the Oxford Health Alliance. He is currently investigating the inter-relationships between insulin resistance and beta cell function, and the effects of a low carbohydrate diet in people with and without type 2 diabetes at Churchill Hospital with the Center of Diabetes, in the United Kingdom.
To view Dr. David R. Matthews's publications, visit PubMed 

The score, a shortcut for estimating insulin resistance (IR), has been examined in multiple studies.
 Results typically show reasonable correlation between HOMA-IR and ‘clamp’ measurement, the gold standard. 
However agreement levels between the two, a more important gauge for individual accuracy and clinical use, are weak, suggesting more research and refinement are needed for clinical use.


Monday, September 3, 2018

Are there more trees on Earth than stars in the Galaxy?

There are 300 million in the Milky Way galaxy that we live in. It is one of 125 billion galaxies in the universe. As our galaxy is only a little over average in size, this means that our star is one of 30 million million stars in the universe. A fantastically large number. This is where the line "There are as many stars as their are grains of sand on every beach in the world" comes... 

  • From Yahoo Answers

    Roughly 400,000,000,000 (400 billion). We do not currently possess the ability or technology to figure out anything close to an exact figure, however NASA has been able to give us a rough estimate. It is as follows: "For example, because of NASA, we can calculate roughly how many trees we have on Earth. Trees, both leafy and otherwise, reflect sunshine in very particular patterns,...Full answer
answers.yahoo.com

update trials of Alzheimers

 The best part of the day is when I have a bowel movement.   Recently started Miralax. I found MOM too harsh. Pacing helps but I get exhaust...