Examining My Mistake with complicated issue.

I have had trouble loading my edited version of  the article on to my blog.

Go to my google doc here:


Sandesara article on FH and CAC

1- Main article

CAC zero had events in original article not mentioned in review

2- Abstract

3- Review

This is article from Ivor that started this discussion

This is where people thought I made a mistake interpreting the data from CAC and FH article



This was my response:

The Annualized rates of events per 1,000 patients 

 101 events f0r CAC  zero 

62 events for CAC 1-100

43 events for CAC greater than 100.

 Below is original article by Sandesara

Bittencourt review